PAX
Agentic Inbox
America Thinks
Chat
Clips
Data dictionary
Docs
Lift
Reports
Survey
PAX
Agentic InboxAmerica ThinksChatClipsData dictionaryDocsLiftReportsSurvey

Reports

Right-click to go to any page

Reports · Methodology

How the reports are made

Randomized, placebo-controlled message tests, each video read against its own wave's placebo

  1. How a test runs
  2. What a lift is
  3. Detectable and inconclusive
  4. Weighting
  5. Subgroups
  6. Sources

Every respondent sees one video or the placebo

A respondent answers a few questions about themselves, is assigned at random to watch one of the test's videos or a placebo video, then answers the ballot question and one question that checks what they understood. Because the assignment is random, the difference between a video's viewers and the placebo's viewers is the video's effect alone.

Each wave has its own placebo, and every lift in a wave is against that placebo. Waves are separate samples; a lift in one wave is never read against another wave's placebo.

A lift is the video's level minus the placebo's, in percentage points

Ballot support

The share choosing Yes on the ballot question, among the video's viewers, minus the same share among the placebo's.

Comprehension

The share identifying the change correctly, among the video's viewers, minus the same share among the placebo's.

A lift marked ≈ is derived from rounded published percentages. The computed waves carry a margin of 1.645 standard errors (a 90% interval); the source reports for Waves 1 and 2 supply no interval endpoints, so none are shown for them.

Detectable means the lift met the wave's stated criterion against its placebo

Detectable

Waves 1 and 2: the source's 90% statistical threshold. A computed wave: a two-sided two-proportion test on Kish effective sample sizes, p below 0.10, with at least 50 actual respondents on each side.

Inconclusive

The comparison did not meet the criterion. It is not evidence that the video had no effect.

The criterion is a statistical decision rule. It does not mean there is a 90% chance any particular person changed their mind.

Every level is weighted to the wave's population

Waves 1 and 2 were weighted by the source to age, gender, race, education, party and 2024 presidential vote.

A computed wave is raked by iterative proportional fitting to targets for Massachusetts general adults (18+) on education, party and 2024 presidential vote, drawn from the audience store's sources. Weights are normalized to a mean of 1 and capped at 5.

The weighted total is not an effective sample size.

A subgroup's bars are levels, not lifts

Each bar is the share choosing Yes inside one subgroup and one arm. A mark means that video differed from the placebo inside that subgroup at the wave's criterion; it does not compare videos with each other.

A hatched bar is a small sample: the source's own flag for Waves 1 and 2, fewer than 50 actual respondents for a computed wave. No multiplicity adjustment is applied across subgroups, so with dozens of subgroup comparisons some marks are likely chance.

Where each report's numbers come from

Massachusetts Message Testing, Wave 1October 2–7, 2026 · 3,600 respondentsGrow Progress Wave 1 report, fielded October 2–7, 2026.
Massachusetts Message Testing, Wave 2October 12–15, 2026 · 2,400 respondentsGrow Progress, “Rapid Message Test Results: Massachusetts nonpartisan primary round 2,” fielded October 12–15, 2026.
Massachusetts Message Testing, Wave 3October 29, 2026 · 2,464 respondentspax-trinity-test-responses:ma-wave-3, computed 2026-10-29 (env development).
Open Primaries Message TestOctober 26–29, 2026 · 2,503 respondentspax-trinity-test-responses:open-primaries-1, computed 2026-10-29 (env development).

Waves 1 and 2 are transcribed from the source's reports. Wave 3 and the Open Primaries Message Test are computed from their tests' own responses, and both came from seeded demo runs: their respondents are simulated, so their figures exercise the pipeline and are not measurements.

Related

Executive summary13 of 16 treatment videos showed detectable ballot support differencesEvery wave · Massachusetts general adults — not verified likely voters · separate samplesWave 1Five of six videos showed detectable ballot choice differences; none showed detectable comprehension differencesOctober 2–7, 2026 · 3,600 respondents (3,564 weighted) · six treatment videos plus placeboWave 2Four of four videos showed detectable ballot support differences; three showed detectable comprehension differencesOctober 12–15, 2026 · 2,400 respondents (2,371 weighted) · four treatment videos plus placeboWave 3Four of six videos showed detectable ballot support differences; one showed detectable comprehension differencesOctober 29, 2026 · 2,464 simulated respondents (2,464 weighted) · six treatment videos plus placeboOpen Primaries Message TestOne of four videos showed detectable ballot support differences; three showed detectable comprehension differencesOctober 26–29, 2026 · 2,503 respondents (2,503 weighted) · four treatment videos plus placebo